Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel O’Donnell's avatar

Hi Shaina, I prefer the book to the movie because the characters are better fleshed out and, as you mentioned, Nicholson looks crazy straight away so there’s no deterioration, it’s just there at the start

I have sympathy for Jack in the book as I have known people like that in real life and his issues are well described and detailed. However, there is no sympathy for movie Jack

Kubrick was quite scathing of the book calling the story weak and the ending hackneyed so it’s no surprise him and King didn’t see eye to eye

I admire the movie but don’t like it and ironically I find Kubrick’s ending really weak and the character of Wendy ridiculously written

So, definitely in the King camp on this one

Expand full comment
Belte's avatar

While I enjoyed both the film and book, I think the book captures the sense of the Overlook as an actual entity moving pieces to ruin and trap characters. The film produces key moments but they all seem happenstance (ie when the hotel room door is opened for Danny). The novel is more terrifying to me as it seems all the characters are but bugs stuck in a spider’s web which is the sentient hotel capable of manifesting phantoms who can harm and actions that can line up as dominos.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts